Page 1 of 1

JB 114/TRITON/MARINECO TOOMAI

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:26 pm
by hartlepoolmonkey
JB-114.jpg
The module JB 114 with TRITON, from IJmuiden, at the bow, and MARINECO TOOMAI from Leith at the stern, arriving in Hartlepool on Monday, June 18th, 2012.

Vessel Details
Ship Type: Platform
Year Built: 2009
Length x Breadth: 55 m X 32 m
Gross Tonnage: 3621, DeadWeight: 0 t
Speed recorded (Max / Average): 7.3 / 6.8 knots
Flag: Bahamas [BS]
Call Sign: C6XJ9
IMO: 8770728
MMSI: 311011900

Re: JB 114

PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:37 pm
by hartlepoolmonkey
JB-114.jpg
The platform JB 114 at Irvine's Quay.

Re: JB 114/STEVNS OCEAN/CRONUS

PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 9:04 pm
by hartlepoolmonkey
JB-114.jpg
The platform JB 114 leaving Hartlepool for the Tees Bay guided by STEVNS OCEAN at the bow with CRONUS at the stern.

Re: JB 114/TRITON/MARINECO TOOMAI

PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2012 5:09 pm
by hartlepoolmonkey
jb114.jpg
The JB 144 approaching Hartlepool from the Tees Bay with FIERY CROSS and STEVNS OCEAN at the bow and CRONUS at the stern.

This was taken from onboard "BREAKER" as seven enthusiastic photographers headed towards the Tees on July 3rd.

Re: JB 114/TRITON/MARINECO TOOMAI

PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 8:17 pm
by hartlepoolmonkey
JB114.jpg
The JB 114 at Irvine's Quay, Hartlepool.

Re: JB 114

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:06 pm
by teesships
JB 114 (8770728), Bahamas, 3621gt, completed Singapore 2009
Working on the windfarm site off Redcar on 9 August 2012.
12280jb114-090812x1.jpg
12280jb114-090812x3.jpg
Ron

Re: JB 114/TRITON/MARINECO TOOMAI

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:44 pm
by Patrick Hill
Ron - I believe she's had some problems recently - Nathan's had some pics on Facebook - as you can see in you photos she is somewhat unbalanced.

Re: JB 114/TRITON/MARINECO TOOMAI

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:23 pm
by hartlepoolmonkey
Nathan tells me that the "Albatros" (docked in Hartlepool at present) is here to help sort out the JB 114 problems.

Re: JB 114/TRITON/MARINECO TOOMAI

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 5:14 pm
by teesships
Patrick,

Thanks for info. Must admit I thought the imbalance was simply a consequence of the mechanics of positioning those bases for the windfarm.

Ron