EEMS SOLAR

Shipping, shipbuilding and craft of the Trent

EEMS SOLAR

Postby teesships » Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:37 pm

EEMS SOLAR (9559614), Netherlands, 1862gt, completed Haiphong 7-2010

Flixborough, River Trent - 27 March 2015:
15029eems-solar270315.jpg
Ron
teesships
 
Posts: 8609
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 7:47 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: EEMS SOLAR

Postby Whickham » Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:45 pm

By gum, that's a big one !

1.46Mb according to my system.
Dave
Whickham
 
Posts: 8353
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 9:10 pm
Location: Whickham, Gateshead

Re: EEMS SOLAR

Postby teesships » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:08 pm

.... but the NEM "system" accepts them!

Ron
teesships
 
Posts: 8609
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 7:47 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: EEMS SOLAR

Postby Whickham » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:35 pm

Indeed so, despite what El Capitino said at:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13137

May have implications elsewhere ?????
Dave
Whickham
 
Posts: 8353
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 9:10 pm
Location: Whickham, Gateshead

Re: EEMS SOLAR

Postby northeast » Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:59 pm

I have just reset the limit to the indicated 500KB ... in line with similar sites.
Cheers, George
northeast
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5474
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 5:13 pm
Location: East Yorkshire

Re: EEMS SOLAR

Postby teesships » Tue Mar 31, 2015 5:37 pm

Noted!!

Therein lies the problem .... some sites want BIG, BIG, BIG! ... even bigger than the 2500 pixel width I have been using of late.
Others want smaller versions.

Will edit as needs must to fit NEM remit. (At 2000 pixels it seems some of my shots straddle the 500KB size!)

Ron
teesships
 
Posts: 8609
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 7:47 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: EEMS SOLAR

Postby Whickham » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:34 pm

As a test, this is Ron's photo reduced in size to 470Kb but still at the original dimensions of 2500 x 1667

eems-solar270315.jpg
Dave
Whickham
 
Posts: 8353
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 9:10 pm
Location: Whickham, Gateshead

Re: EEMS SOLAR

Postby Whickham » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:35 pm

You can see that there is a slight loss of definition, but it was a rather extreme example.
Dave
Whickham
 
Posts: 8353
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 9:10 pm
Location: Whickham, Gateshead

Re: EEMS SOLAR

Postby northeast » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:53 pm

What I do as a matter of routine for web photos is reduce to 1500 wide, sharpen then compress to just below 500kb.
To me these look fine for web purposes, even when enlarged from display size.
Here it is on this basis ... click on it to see it at 1500 wide, to me better than the wider format
EEMSSOLAR1500pix.jpg
1500 pix 490kb
Cheers, George
northeast
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5474
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 5:13 pm
Location: East Yorkshire

Re: EEMS SOLAR

Postby teesships » Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:33 pm

Unfortunately in my Photo Impression editor there does not seem to be any facility to compress images - I did have that in whatever I used when I first started.

Reducing my edited image to 1500 pixels still produces an image sized at 566KB! Experimentation required!!!!
15029eems-solar270315reduced.jpg

Oh, and look, the "system" has allowed me to show it????

Ron
teesships
 
Posts: 8609
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 7:47 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Next

Return to The Trent

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron